Ruby developers like to be clear in their naming of variables, modules, classes, methods, and so on. I believe this comes from the idea that code should need very few inline comments if it is written clearly and descriptively. This descriptive naming strategy, combined with the decidedly non-English origins of Ruby (Japanese) and Rails (Danish), often result in oddly-named creations such as
#execute_query_as_logged_in_user_without_transaction_logging (which I just made up), and
#validates_numericality_of (which is real).
A newcomer might find these tongue-twisting, hyper-descriptive naming conventions maddening, but most of the time the intent becomes so much clearer as a result, it becomes infectious; in no time you find yourself writing your own 30-letter, borderline-semantically-correct method names and producing highly maintainable, readable, self-documenting code. That doesn't mean it happens all the time, though...
When I first ran across
#with_indifferent_access I had no choice but to look it up as I had no hope of figuring out what it meant. "Indifferent" is how I feel when my wife asks me if I want chicken & snow peas or chicken & broccoli for dinner, not how I feel about ruby hashes. Admittedly, I was a little disappointed then to discover HashWithIndifferentAccess doesn't do much: it just extends a Hash so that you can retrieve values with either string or symbol keys. The Hash is "indifferent" as to which type of key you send it.
This appears related to
Hash#symbolize_keys, but also converts hashes within the hash.
Feedback and Article Ideas
Want to see a topic explored here? Send Me a Message.